How's Everybody Doing?

Hey, how's everybody doing?  Well that's great to hear, assuming you said you're doing well.  If you're a Pirates or Reds fan, you're probalby doing alright.  If you're a Indians or Rays fan, you're probably doing decent, but a little on edge.  If you're a Yankees or Orioles fan, you're probably not doing all that great right now.  If you're a Rangers fan, you have got to be feeling anxious, yet confident.  If you're a Royals fan, you're just happy to be in this convorstion now, aren't you?  So I assume the Royals fan is doing pretty alright considering everything.  The Dodgers, Braves, Red Sox or Cardinals fan, you're doing just fine, thanks you very much.  Tigers, well, you haven't exactly clinched anything yet, but you're feeling alright, I imagine.

Yes, it's the final week of the regular season, and I'm pretty sad about it.  (as I'm typing this, I'm watching the Rays and Orioles game and Manny Machado just went down with an injury to his leg.  Didn't look good, and that certainly isn't good for the Orioles...anyway) I'm sad because I'm going to miss all the baseball, all the time.  I know that the postseason is special, but it's not the same as some random White Sox Astros game in the middle of the season, you know what I mean?  It becomes less of a passtime in October, and hearts start getting broken.  As a Braves fan, I know my heart is about to be broken again this year, because that's the nature of the beast.  If my team happens to win the thing, I'd be elated, but I have to keep my hopes high, but my expectations tempered.  Crushing losses in the past few seasons had left me jaded and disenchanted with the game of baseball for a while there.  I'm so emotionally invested in this season and this team, but I know what's coming.  I've seen this movie before.

Anyway, this has been a fun season.  It's had it's stories and it's shenanigans and what have you.  It's had it's heroes and goats.  I probably wont' remember this season as like, anything other than entertaining at best, it's still one of the most important seasons in my life, as far as a fan goes.  I continue to learn so much more about the game everyday, even though I've been such a fan for all of my life.  That's what so great about this game, there's always something new to explore about it.

So I just wanted to stop by and type my thoughts about this stuff.  I'm excited to see what happens in the postseason.  Here's to hoping for something special.

-Brad

...And Down The Stretch They Come! MLB enters the home stretch

I just finished watching the Braves win with a walk-off home run from Justin Upton, and while baseball is still fresh in my brain, and before I switch my brain into English Premier League mode, I feel like I should type about baseball.  I think it's time to take a look around the leagues quick and see what's up.  

But before we look at the standings, remember Antonio Alfonseca?  That dude had six fucking fingers.  

Anyway...

 Fun.

Prediction for the AL?  I think it ends up being exactly as it is right now.  Perhaps Oakland will win the west, and Texas makes the wild card game, but that's about all I'd change.  

National League!!!!

Also fun, but maybe not as fun.  

The Dodgers and Braves have insurmountable leads.  The Reds are surging, the Cardinals are bleeding and the Pirates are hanging in there.  To me, the National League is a five team race already.  It will end up exactly how it is, and that's the way it should be.  Arizona has no business in the postseason this year. Neither do the Gnats.  

Three quarters of the season is over already.  I'm not one to advocate the watching of American League games often, but now I must do so.  There's just so much left to be decided out there.  Alright, have a good day, and go Arsenal! 

Leave Human Error In The Game of Baseball

Alright, I'm staying up tonight and catching the only late night baseball game happening, and it's the Padres and Mets.  I'm pretty sick of watching the Mets at this point, but what am I supposed to do?  They're the only game on right now.  Anyway, during the broadcast, they brought up the fact that MLB is flirting with the idea of expanding instant replay.  Call me old school, which you can freely do, but I can't stand the idea of replay in baseball.  I understand it's usefulness on home run calls, because there's no umpire out there to get a good look at that ball traveling at a high rate of speed, weather it's a home run or not.  I don't like it, but I understand how it's useful.  My problem is that baseball isn't football.  It isn't hockey.  It isn't basketball.  It's not tennis.  It's baseball, the game that at it's core, is the best at keeping the game the same for it's entire life. The reason is so you can debate whether Joe DiMaggio was a better player than Mickey Mantle.  Or Ted Williams compares to Hank Aaron.  Or whatever you want to compare.  Because I believe that this game is the closest you can get to transplanting players from generation to generation, because the game is quite similar to the previous generations.  You cannot put a hockey player or football player or basketball player from today and put them in the league in the 50's, because they will be far and away superior an athlete. Johnny Unitas would be a furniture salesman in 2013.

(the irony of this post, as I've gone on to a tangent, is that there's a "disputed" home run call that's being reviewed by the umpires.)

Shit Happens

Anyway, there's an aspect of baseball that I believe we all should have to live with, as our fathers and grandfathers had to live with, and that's human error.  I prefer an ump to blow a call every now and then.  My team, the Braves, lost their season (sort of) last year on a blown call by an umpire.  That's just the way it goes, man.  Bummer.  I love baseball and I want my team to win, but it's not, and should not be, the end of the world if your team doesn't win.  It's just a game.  I've grown so tired of the NFL, with constant analysis of every single play, every single little thing gets nitpicked to make sure the call is right.  Who gives a shit?  Just play the damn game.  Quit worrying about what the ref called.  If you don't want the referee to be a factor, play good enough that it doesn't matter if they blow a call against you.

Tony Gwynn is doing color analysis during this broadcast tonight, and he said he is a convert of the replay issue.  He used to be against it, but is for it now because he doesn't want to see teams get screwed by bad calls anymore.  Fine, I understand that argument, but he then sited the Armando Galarraga game for the Tigers, the game against the Indians a few years ago, where a blown call cost that kid a perfect game.  He said if there wasn't a blown call, he would have a perfect game and we would remember that for the rest of our lives.  Let me ask you, don't you remember it anyway?  Perhaps, if you're like me, you remember it better because the incident happened?  Baseball is a story, and people are around to remember those stories and tell others about it.  If you love baseball, you love the human error aspect as much as you love a beautiful curve ball that cripples a batters knees.  People make mistakes, and that's what makes baseball special, because it's played by people, not robots.  Just because the technology exists, doesn't mean it makes the game better.  Leave human error in the game, for the love of the game.  

Bud Norris Makes O's Debut...Against the Team That Traded Him

Today is the first day of the "dog days of August."  This is the month where your favorite team plays against it's divisional enemies like 80% of their games.  As a Braves fan, this means a ton of Nationals, Phillies and Marlins games.  Also as a Braves fan, this is a good thing.

Today's match ups are okay, I suppose, but there is one game on the schedule today/tonight that really got me intrigued.

Here's all the starters and what not from around baseball today.

As you can see as of my writing this, the Indians have already beaten the White Sox today 6-1.  It's interesting because I would have maybe picked Masterson against Sale as a potential Match Up Of The Day candidate, because Chris Sale can't get a win despite pitching quite well lately.  Anyway, he lost again, and I feel bad for him because he's a good pitcher on a terrible team.  

The most intersting thing on the schedule today has to be Bud Norris making his Orioles debut against the team that just traded him to Baltimore, the Astros.  I wonder who has the advantage here, the hitters who have seen every one of Norris' starts this season, so they know what he likes to throw, or Norris, who knows these hitters weaknesses?  I imagine that since the O's are a far superior team that they will probably win, but it's a weird element to what would normally have been a rather mundane Thursday night game in Baltimore.  

Matt Cain against Cole Hammels is interesting because they're both regarded as top pitchers, but they've not performed up to their expectations this season.  In fact, neither the Phillies nor the Giants have played like themselves this year.  But that's really all that makes this interesting.  The game itself is pretty meaningless.

Will the Royals finally lose? They're playing right now and I don't know the score, but they're heating up, as much as the Royals can really heat up, I suppose.  I believe the term for them would be "Streaky."

Hey, how about those red hot Atlanta Braves, eh?

Okay, that's all for today.  Enjoy baseball.  

Probable Pitchers for 7-23-13 around the MLB

Tough day here at Safety Squeeze.  Why is that?  Trying to pick a pitching match up to highlight for tonight.  Sure, there are some quality pitchers toeing the rubber this evening, but most of them are against far infurior pitchers.  Well, see for yourself...

You see, not much to choose from.  Even the pitchers that are quality aren't that great.  I suppose this is what you get when everyone is on their fifth start after the All-Star break.  But if I have to choose one, I'll go with Jose Fernandez of the Marlins against Jhoulys Chacin of the Rockies.  Now, this game features two teams that are not doing too well in the grand scheme of the National League, but both of these pitchers are notable for different reasons.  Jose Fernandez is expected to be the teams ace...eventually.  He's pitched well this season, especially for a rookie on the worst team in the NL (maybe.)  Jhoulys Chacin is just flat out pitching over his head, but until he proves to me and everyone else that he's coming back to earth, I have to expect he's going to have a quality outing time in and time out.  I think Fernandez will be a solid starter...eventually. Right now he's doing fine, and I'll be curious to see how this one shakes out.  Well, as curious as anyone would be when the Rockies and Marlins get together.  

Okay, that's it for today.  Watch some baseball, eh?

7-22-13 Probable Starters

Probably the biggest story of the past few days in this post-All-Star game period is the potential trade of Matt Garza from the Cubs to anywhere else, which completely fell apart for Texas. The Cubs tried to jump the gun and get something for Garza ten days before they had to, asking teams for their best offers now, presumably in an attempt to get good prospects before they are moved in other deals. It's a logical move, but you can't really hold another team's feet to the fire like you can at 3:58 PM on July 31st, when teams get desperate and show their hands, finally indicating the prospects they're willing to deal. 

Starters for July 22nd (and thank goodness there's so many games on a Monday!)

The best matchup I see is for the two guys who pitched first and second for the AL in the All-Star game, Scherzer vs. Sale at Chicago. The Pale Hose are in the crapper this year and don't have much of a farm system to speak of (Baseball America ranks them 26th) but they aren't interested in trading Sale and I don't blame them - he has too many years of team control and the Sox could easily get back into contention. You also have Tom Gorzelanny making his first start in a while. Matt Garza might get a start in before he gets traded, or he could get the Ubaldo Jimenez treatment (he got traded mid-game after pitching an inning. You would think Cleveland would have re-evaulated after seeing him give up four runs.) He coincidentally is also throwing. Yu Darvish is coming off the DL - you see a lot more players take the DL stint this time of year over working through an injury since the All-Star break keeps a player off the field regardless.  

Don't forget, Big Gorzy is pitching. Enjoy the games today. Too bad there's no day ball!

Probable Starters for MLB 7-21-13! Harvey vs Lee

So what happened here?  I'm allergic to posting in July or something?  I'll tell you what happened, I had my family visiting for the week of the 4th of July and didn't really have the boring downtime to write up the daily pitching matchups of the days.  Then the family left and I felt weird jumping back into it as if nothing happened, and now I'm sitting here wondering what went wrong after that?  I guess it was just an All-Star break.  Not much to write about there, except perhaps a recap, in my own opinion, of the first half of the season.  But I didn't do that either.  Now I'm here, back at the same spot before I had a week or two of posts that were not even that bad for once.  Oh well, let's just jump back into it.

Today there are many pitching match ups that you should be aware of, and some are better than others, as usual.  That's why I highlight one here and call it the Safety Squeeze Pitching Matchup of the Day ™

First off, a screen grab of those match ups from around the league.  (also I think I'll finally admit that matchup is two words starting now.)

For me, I have to choose Cliff Lee against Matt Harvey.  Matt Harvey had a bit of a coming out moment getting to start the All-Star game on Tuesday, which is nice for him.  I mean, he mostly got the nod because he's the home town hero right now, as much as the Mets have as far as heros go.  He's been solid, as many predicted.  Cliff Lee is absolutely no slouch, in fact, I'd say he's at least top five in the world.  Too bad he plays for the Phillies.  And too bad Harver pitches for the Mets, too.  Because I really want to like these guys, but man, I just can't do it too loudly because of the hats they wear.  I pick this one because I really don't know who's going to win this game.  I think the Mets are a better team than the Phillies (seriously) but Cliff Lee is too good to lose to the Mets.  What a quandary.  

Other notable match ups include Doug Fister against "Big Game" James Shields.  Did you know Big Game James gave himself that nickname?  YOU CAN'T DO THAT JIMMY.  It doesn't work that way.  Other people have to call you a name before it becomes a nickname that can be repeated,  

Enjoy baseball today.  

Make Love Not WAR (wins above replacement)

So this morning I learned what Wins Above Replacement, or WAR is all about.  I thought it was probably stupid based upon it's name, and after actually looking into what it calculates, I would say it's not as stupid as I thought it would be, but it's still a rather useless statistic.  So basically it measures how much better a player is better than an average AAA-level or bench player?  That's stupid.  Number one, not all AAA players are average.  Sometimes a guy comes up and rips it up because he's pumped about playing in the majors.  It measures how valuable a player is to the team.  Like as if to say "without him, we'd be stuck with this jabroni over here and we'd be screwed."  Okay, fine, but if you watched a baseball game once in a while, you would see a guys value using your own two eyes, no?  Why not just look at his ERA, or even his SIERA?  Wins?  K's? I get that WAR is a composite score of a dudes value, but it doesn't tell me much.  So Cliff Lee and Clayton Kershaw have really good WARs?  NO SHIT.  Just look at any of their regular, standard numbers and you could gather that yourself.  Or better yet, watch a Phillies or Dodgers game.  That's how I figured it out.  I don't need WAR and I will probably forever roll my eyes whenever I hear or read anyone mention it.

I'm stuck in this spot between embracing advanced stats and stepping back and realizing that advanced stats are clearly for people that don't watch baseball.  I don't watch Rockies games, so I can learn how Michael Cuddyer is doing by reading about his WAY inflated BABIP this morning.  Makes sense to me, because he's Michael Cuddyer, so I knew something was up.  There's no way the Michael Cuddyer I remember could be putting up these kind of numbers without some luck.  But I imagine if I watched a few Rockies games, I could tell you he's on a hot streak right now, and baseball has this wonderful thing called Regression to the Mean, where every player either gradually gets better or worse over the course of a career.  Any jumps in productivity means their slumping or on a hot streak.  Many, many players throughout the season and throughout the history of baseball go up and down throughout their careers.  Things like BABIP help to show you when that's happening so you don't have to watch baseball, because who would ever want to do that?

Starters and What to Watch For, 6-29-13 MLB Preview

I hope you guys managed to figure out who was starting all the games in the MLB the past two days without me.  Somehow, I know most of you struggled to figure out who would be the best matchups for each day, but honesly, I have company coming this weekend, so I had to spend a lot of time deep cleaning the apartment.  Also, I find it hard to sit down and type when my wife is home, and she took the last two days off work, so I was busy.  Is that okay with you?  It better be...

Here's today's starters.

As you can see, a full slate on a Saturday, per usual.  The trick is looking at these wonderful matchups and figuring out which ones are the ones to watch.  I've spotted a few, but I've not gone through all the trouble to figure out which ones are the most interesting besides the obvious choices...

So, the Safety Squeeze Pitching Matchup of the Day ™ ™is...

Cliff Lee and Hyun-Jin Ryu...wow way to branch out, Blogger.  Yeah, just take two guys who were already featured here this past week and rehash that shit.  Well, let me tell you, it's the best matchup.  The Dodgers got housed at home last night by these Phillies, but today is a new day.  The only reason that Dodger Stadium didn't empty out faster than **insert pop culture reference about substance abuse here** is because there was a fireworks show after the game.  Or, as Vin Scully would have had you believe if you were listening to his broadcast last night, to witness one more at bat of Yasiel Puig.  Ha, no Vin, you're the best, but they wanted to see the fireworks they already paid for.  Should be a good one.  

Another matchup that caught my eye is Chris Archer and the Rays against the Tigers and Justin Verlander.  Verlander's stats aren't that far out of line from what he's done throughout his career except his BABIP.  I expect Verlander to turn that around, as BABIP is a determination of luck, and his BABIP is elevated.  Once that BABIP evens out, expect Verlander to appear to be the guy he used to be, which he technically already is.  He's just been unlucky. Plus, it's not like the Tigers have the greatest defense.  I imagine a lot of the line drives that are being hit off him would be caught if the defense behind him was better.  

Okay, that's all.  Go watch the Tigers Rays game then the Phillies Dodgers game late, and you'll be a happy baseball fan of you make these choices.  

Schedule and Starters for MLB 6-26-13

Just to let you know, I'm afraid to look up yesterday's results, because I'm watching last night's Braves game and I'm currently in the 7th inning, so I don't want the result to be spoiled.  I have no idea how things went around the league last night.  I hope you understand.

So today is a Wednesday, so that means day games!  There are two early start day games, The Jays and Rays, and the Twins and Marlins.  Pretty weak, but once this Braves game ends, I'll probably turn on the Jays Rays game because I haven't seen much of Tampa this season, and I need to see what's up with those guys.

Without anymore delay, here's today's schedule, with starters...

And now, your Safety Squeeze Pitching Matchup of the Day ™ ™

Tough call today, as there are a lot of weird matchups.  Mike Minor is pitching, but it's against Luis Mendoza, so that's not special, in my opinion.

I don't know, the one that stood out to me, I suppose is Roy Oswalt against John Lackey.  Lackey has been effective this season, and I'm curious how Oswalt will preform this year.  His first outing, he struck out 11, but only lasted five innings because of it.  He also gave up seven hits.  I have always liked the guy, so I want him to do well.  The Red Sox are no easy task, so I'll be interested to see how he does tonight.  John Lackey on the other hand comes in with a 3.03 ERA, which is nice.  He'll keep the Sox in any game he pitches.

Also around the league today, Tim Lincecum pitches in LA against Clayton Kershaw, who despite a wonderful 2.06 ERA, his record is only 5-5, causing fantasy owners heads to explode when wins is one of the categories you need to be successful.  He hasn't won a game in over a month.  Blame the Dodgers here.

the battle of the 6-6 pitchers takes place in Milwaukee as Scott Feldman and Yovani Gallardo square off.  Gallardo has a 4.09 ERA for the season, but a 1.67 ERA in June, so he's been much better as of late.  The Brewers aren't going to get a whole lot done as a team while looking up at the Pirates, Reds and Cardinals, but they've played a lot better lately.  The Cubs looked like they were getting it together back in May, but they're still not very good.  The Brewers smoked the Cubs 9-3 last night, and I sort of expect a similar result today.  Not sure why I'm talking about this one, to be honest...

That's all I'm gonna type now, so enjoy the 2007 World Series rematch tonight in Boston.  That's the one to watch.  

SS Pitching Matchup of the Day! 6/25/13

I'm still trying to settle on what to title these daily posts...anyway.

I don't have a lot of time today, as I was busy playing Monopoly on my iPad with my sister in law all afternoon, but here's today's pitching matchups around the league.

As you can see, quite the opposite of yesterday's schedule, as everyone is in action tonight.  

Now, for the Safety Squeeze Pitching Matchup of the Day™ ™

For me, it's got to be Chris Sale against Zack Wheeler.  Wheeler was outstanding in his major league debut last week against the Braves and Chris Sale, though he doesn't have the record to show it, is still heading towards being one of the elite pitchers.  I don't have time to explain why this is going to be a good one, but just trust me.  Chris Sale hasn't won a game since May 17th, five weeks ago.  He's still good, though.

One more thing, how many times does a starter dazzle everyone in his debut, and even for the first few times out, and regress back to where he's supposed to be?  Scouting reports.  Once guys see a pitcher a few times, they learn how to hit them.  Take a look at Barry Zito and Dontrelle Willis.  Perfect examples of that.  Some guys never regress, and only progress, like Verlander, but most of the time, a rookie comes up and looks outstanding, then regresses.  Happens all the time.  Anyway, that's what I expect out of Wheeler.  I imagine Wheeler will dominate again tonight, mostly because it's against the White Sox, but I also expect him to get rocked a few times as the season progresses.  I've seen this movie before.  

Anyway, I gotta jet.  Have a good night.  Go baseball.  

Starters for 6/24/13 Around the MLB

There are only four games on the schedule today, which has to be one of the lightest schedule days of the entire season.  That's good because game six of the Stanley Cup Final is tonight.  Got to be watching some hockey tonight.  BUT, if you don't like hockey so much, or if maybe you are just not into this final because you don't like the teams or whatever reason you can come up with, there's some ball to be played tonight.  Here's the starting pitchers for this evening.

I had originally planned on the advanced stats post from yesterday on Cliff Lee instead of Jhoulys Chacin, but when I found that interesting stat, I had to change course.  I spent a lot of time scouring over Cliff Lee's stats yesterday and found them to remarkably average.  I mean, average for his standards and for the league in general.  He's doing nothing out of ordinary to indicate anything other than the usual success for Lee for the remainder of the season, of course if he can remain healthy.  The health factor goes for all players, that goes without question.

Anyway so I have to decide which of these pitching matchups I'm going to declare the Match Up Of The Day ™ ™

I'm going to choose the Giants and Dodgers game form good old Dodgers stadium late tonight.  Partly because perhaps after the hockey game ends, I can turn this on and watch.  Madison Bumgarner is the future of that pitching staff in San Francisco.  Throught equal amount of starts to begin a career, Bumgarner's stats are shockingly similar to the highly regarded lefty in Los Angeles, Clayton Kershaw.  Kershaw has been around longer, so his numbers are better, but if you dial it back to what he was doing when he was at the spot that Bumgarner is at, they're very similar.  One would tend to believe that Madison Bumgarner will soon be recoginized as the next great lefty pitching in California, if he's not there with all the fans around the league just yet.  As a Braves fan, I've watched him pitch twice this season against the Braves, and he was just about unhittable in those starts.  I'm not sure what he's looked like in his other starts, but judging by the fact that he's actually lost four games this year would indicate that he's just super good against Atlanta's lineup.  If he pitched like he did against the Braves all the time, you might as well rename the trophy after him instead of Cy Young.

His opponent (use a Howard Finkel voice for this), weighing 255 lbs, from Incheon, Korea HYUN-JIN RYUUUUUUUUUU.

But seriously, Ryu has an amazing Haduken, but I've always perfered Ken, probably because I'm a white American male.  I watched Ryu pitch last wednesday against the Yankees in a day game and he was okay.  Not lights out, but he was effective.  6.0 IP, 5H, 3ER, 2BB, 4K and took the loss.  Hiroki Kuroda was just better that day.  Also, Ichiro had a good game.  It was a super Asian afternoon in the Bronx.  Ryu will be seeking his first win since he beat the the Angels Angels back on May 28th.  His 2.57 ERA looks good.

Also, along with the pretty good pitching match up, it's always nice to watch the Giants and Dodgers play.  There is certainly no love lost here, as these two have been rivals for over 100 years.  Also, with the Dodgers already being involved in two bench-clearing brawls this season, that might happen, too.  Oh and that hot-head Yasiel Puig just might be a shit-stirrer again.  I wouldn't put it past him.

Also tonght, Esmil Rogers, who is so good they named the Blue Jays stadium after him, will try to keep the Blue Jays' 11 game winning streak alive against the Rays in Tampa.  Jeremy Hellickson gets the start for the Rays.  Hellickson beat the Red Sox last Wednesday, but he gave up seven hits over six innings.  I'll take the Jays.

And I suppose I have to mention that Ubaldo Jimenez starts for the Indians against the Orioles and Zach Britton. Here you have two second place teams trying to gain some ground on their idle division leaders. I'm sure this interests someone out there.

So enjoy the hockey tonight.  It could be the last of it until the fall.  And if you don't, you're a crazy person.  Watch baseball tomorrow.  That's the beauty of the game.  You can watch it tomorrow. It's okay.

The Detroit Tigers are the Taco Bell/Pizza Hut Combo of Baseball

I mean think about it. Some items are a real value, while some items are pretty expensive. And they're both looking for closers. 

  

Dan Haren "Physically, I'm okay" But Placed on the DL Anyway

Yesterday, I remarked on Twitter that I had watched 8 and a half innings of a Nationals Rockies game, and that I have a sickness, an illness, that makes me watch baseball games that I shouldn't care about, or perhaps  didn't even care about a few weeks ago.  Anyway, as I watched, Dan Haren was getting lit up, and I predicted he was injured.  I've suspected he was injured for a while, because I heard his fastball velocity was down, but according to his FanGraphs pitchfx, even though his fastball velocity has dropped every year he's pitched in the majors, there wasn't a major drop like I was expecting to find.  Anyway, he's hurt, but if you read his quote, it sounds more like managment is telling him he's hurt, but want to sit him for a few starts because they can't afford to keep throwing out a liability like Dan Haren every five days.

"There's aches and pains." he said on Sunday, "nothing I haven't pitched through in the past.  Physically, I'm okay."  It's easy to say he has a "stiff shoulder" because what major league pitcher doesn't have a stiff shoulder the day after he pitches in June?

Jhoulys Chacin has an Unsustainable HR to FB ratio! My first sojourn into the world of Advanced Stats

Okay, here's my first go at taking a good look at a guys advanced stats to figure out what kind of pitcher he really is. Hang on tight, because it's probably going to be ugly and wrong.   The subject is Colorado Rockies pitcher Jhoulys Chacin.  I have heard his name pronounced properly a number of times by now, and I still don't know how to pronounce it, so to me he's Jew-Hoolies Cha-Seen.  I know that's not correct, but that's what I'm going with in my head.  I've decided to use Mr. Chacin because I stumbled across a number that shocked me.  Jhoulys Chacin leads the majors in HR/FB ratio.  And his home park is Coors Field.

The basic, standard stats suggest a middle of the road, perhaps slightly above average pitcher, which is something that is required if you're going to have any pitching success with the Rockies.  Obviously pitching in that ballpark is not ideal, so they have to overpay guys and take chances on others to get anyone to pitch there.  The overpay part is dedicated to Mike Hampton, the take a chance on him guys include Roy Oswalt and Jamie Moyer.  Two of those three haven't worked out so good and the other, it's too early to tell.  Good luck Mr. Oswalt.  Anyway, they can also draft and sign young pitchers who want to make it to the majors and test fate by coming up in the Rockies organization.

Jhoulys Chacin, let's get into it.  Homeboy didn't win a single game in the month of May.  That's not good.  However, he has won his previous three starts, two against the Nationals and one against the Phillies. He has an overall record of 6-3 in 14 starts. Okay, getting better, but we all know that wins is not a good stat to judge a pitcher on.  Okay, lets continue on.  His ERA currently sits at 3.92, and some of that is inflated by his horrible month of May where his ERA ballooned to 5.87.  He's pitched better as of late, so that'll bring that down to earth.  1.24 WHIP is not great, but not terrible.  The number that stood out to me is his home runs given up, which is TWO!  A Rockies pitcher that has only given up two homers.  One on opening day against AT the Brewers and one on June 1st at home against the Dodgers.  So that means one home run given up at Coors Field in nine starts.  Yes, a mediocre Colorado Rockies pitcher has the major league's best HR/FB ratio, at 2.5%.  Yeah, that's not sustainable, is it?  He does boast a nice 48% ground ball percentage, which ranks him 35th in baseball.  So it's not like he's getting all grounders, which would explain the lack of homers, but the league leader in ground ball percentage, Trevor Cahill at 58%, has a HR/FB of 10.7%.  So what gives?  Shouldn't these two numbers correlate?

In fact, in the top 10 of guys for GB%, there are only two guys who have HR/FB rate under 10%, and none of them are below 5%, and that's Doug Fister and Jon Niese.

And that's when I scroll a little further down the page and realize that another Rockies pitcher, Jorge de la Rosa also has a HR/FB ratio that's shockingly low, he's at 7%,  Alright, is this what all the pitchers are doing out there in Colorado?  Let's have a look.

The answer is no, they've been terrible.  Jeff Francis, Juan Nicasio and John Garland have all been pretty not great.  Jeff Francis had a HR/FB of 20.4%, for crying out loud, but he did have a 7.44 K/9, which was best on the team.  He also got sent to the minors four days ago, and in came Roy Oswalt.  Of the five Rockies starters I'm talking about here, they've all got FB ratios between 27%-33%, but it's only Chacin and de la Rosa that are managing to keep those fly balls in the park.  They weren't hitting line drives off Francis (18,1%) but they sure were hitting the home runs (11).  They are hitting line drives off de la Rosa (26.5%), but not many home runs (five, 7%, as I mentioned before).  And Chacin has a line drive rate of 23.5%, which is pretty good.  5.26 K/9 for Chacin as well...I don't really get how this is happening.

So what am I trying to say here?  I guess I'm trying to say that Jorge de la Rosa and Jhoulys Chacin have been pretty good, but I don't know if it's sustainable with that park.  If this is what has driven some of their success, I would be worried.  I wish I had time to go back and look at the history of the Rockies starting pitchers and see if any of these numbers have ever been sustained by anyone.  Like I said , I'm really only getting started in this crazy world of advanced stats (something I just a few weeks ago wrote a post rallying against as a regular old fan of the game) so I don't know if comparing HR/FB ratio to GB% is even something I should be doing, but as a fan of baseball, it would make sense to me that if you induce a lot of ground balls, they're not going to go for a lot of home runs, unless everyone is really fast base runners who get inside-the-parkers. I don't think that's ever going to be the case.  And it would also make sense to me that if you are giving 28.5% of the balls hit off you are going for fly balls, more than one at Coors field should have left the park by now.  The other starters have similar fly ball numbers and theirs ARE leaving the park.

So despite Jhoulys Chacin's pedestrian 6-3 win-loss record and 3.92 ERA, he's actually pitched pretty good so far because he has avoided the long ball.  But how long can that be sustained with a fly ball rate at 28.5%?  I would guess that whatever mediocre stats he's put up thus far, be it ERA, wins, WHIP, BABIP what-have-you, will only get worse once the unsustainable HR/FB ratio evens out and he starts giving up dingers at a more acceptable clip.  It should REALLY be noted here that he has a career HR/FB ratio of 9.5%...so expect regression.

All this work, and I'm sure any Rockies fan that has actually watched their games would tell me, NO SHIT.  I guarantee that what I'm writing does nothing to change the experience of the average Rockies fan, nor educate that fan.  I put in all this work and now I'm thinking "so what?"  So they haven't given up home runs, have they won games in which they've pitched?  Yeah, sure they have.  It's a crowded west, with the Padres suddenly finding life.  It's just something to keep in mind the next time you're watching a Rockies game.  Jhoulys Chacin has the lowest HR/FB ratio this season in all of baseball and he plays for the Rockies.  That's just interesting.  

Starters for 6/23/13 Around the MLB

I'd like to do this daily, but I doubt I will.  I will do this as often as I can, because I think it's interesting, at least.

It's Sunday, and you know what that means!  That means every team in all of Baseball is in action today.  Looking at the schedule, I noticed that there is only four games on the schedule tomorrow, so set your fantasy rosters accordingly.  But lets not get ahead of ourselves here, let's focus on today's games.

Here's the starting pitchers for today, as of this writing:

 As you can see here, there's a few interesting match ups today, but mostly I see a lot of mismatches.  Samardzija vs Jordan Lyles, perhaps?  But then you stop and realize it's the Astros vs the Cubs, so that's not interesting.  The one that pops out to me is Mat Latos and the Reds against the (still) first place Diamondbacks and Randal Delgado.  Former Atlanta Brave Delgado was part of the Justin Upton trade.  I've been to three Braves games in my life.  The starting pitchers for those Braves games were John Smoltz, Tim Hudson...and Randal Delgado.  You can imagine which one the Braves lost, right?  Yeah, but anyway, he's made two appearances and one start for the Diamondbacks this season.  That one start was this past Tuesday evening, where gave up eight hits and two runs while striking out six over seven innings against the suddenly resurgent(?!) Miami Marlins.  By all accounts, a solid outing.  He was given a no-decision but the DBacks won on a Paul Goldschmidt walk-off home run.  Delgado was a top prospect in the Braves organization before sputtering out in his chance in the majors, and ultimately dealt to Arizona along with a number of other prospects and my beloved Martin Prado for Justin Upton, a trade that at this point has been won by Atlanta, I think.  But Delgado has an upside.  At first, it seemed to be a trade of Prado for Upton, but who knows?  Maybe Delgado will thrive in Arizona and somewhere down the line, we'll be asking ourselves "They traded him for HIM?!?"  I guess a lot of that future began last Tuesday, and continues today against the Reds and their highly touted offense, led by my fantasy hero, Joey Votto.  

(no one cares about my or your fantasy team...remember that in the future.)

Other pitching highlight today is the next start from the electric Matt Harvey.  It's against the Phillies, so you never know how that will go.  

Highly touted pitching prospect TBD (awful parents for naming their child that!) gets the start for Baltimore

I'm very interested to see what Matt Cain does today against the Marlins.  His starts have all kinds of inconsistent numbers lately.  We'll have to see which Matt Cain shows up today.  He has a 7.22 ERA in day games, but I don't know how many day games he's pitched.  I know he got lit up by St. Louis in a day game, and I'm sure that's probably throwing that number off.  Anyway, We shall see. 

Joe Blanton will go for his 11th loss today.  Cole Hammels got his on Friday night.  At least Hammels has more than one win, however.  Ouch.

Adam Wainwright pitches tonight. Not a good pitching match up though, so it don't get featured here.  It just gets mentioned at the end.  

So enjoy the games today and mostly, enjoy the pitching.  

New Direction

I've been struggling with what to do with this space.  I know I want to write about baseball, but I've been trying to figure out a new way to do it.  I don't have the time to dig for the real interesting, perhaps obscure tidbits from around the league, but that was my first inclination.  You know, sort of an "in case you missed it" sort of thing.  Well, I probably missed it, so I can't do that.

If a Tree Falls...

If a tree falls in the woods, and no one is around to hear it, does it actually make a sound?

If I craft a baseball blog in the woods, would anyone read it?  What about in a city?

Welcome everyone to Safety Squeeze, a baseball blog no one bothers to read.  I could write the greatest baseball post of all time, with sweeping coverage and analysis, written with the grace of great poets, covering of all 30 major league teams with in-depth coverage of all the results and stories from each game, previews of all the next days action and perhaps the stories that might otherwise fall through the cracks, but it matters not; no one will be reading.  Why do I write anyway?  Because I don't care if no one reads it.  I just want to write it.

With that being said, let's talk about baseball.  Yasiel Puig of the Los Angeles Dodgers has debuted this week with a splash, hitting four homeruns in four games.  That's special, but I wish he wasn't hitting clutch homers against the Braves.  He grand slam on Thursday night to extend the games lead to 5 runs, and he broke a 1-1 tie in the late innings on Friday night to set up extra innings, where the Dodgers won on a walk-off wild pitch.  Great.  I know that baseball is a marathon not a sprint, and losing two games in Los Angeles in early June is nothing to cry about in the long run, but as a competitive fan, I don't like to see my team lose. It's going to happen, and they say that if you don't like losing, you shouldn't be involved with baseball, but I sure wouldn't mind it the Atlanta Braves would go 162-0.

Last time I wrote here I wrote about Jeremy Bonderman and his return to the majors after a three year absence due to many horrible health ailments.  I wrote about how wonderful it would be if we all watched to see how the man performed.  Well, I didn't watch the game.  I watched Bonderman record one out, to end an inning, and I don't even remember how that out was recorded or what inning it was.  I got busy when I got home, okay?  The Mariners got beat that day, I don't know, something like 10-1 and Bonderman seems to have pitched like someone who hasn't pitched to big leaguers in three years.  I don't know for sure, like I said, I didn't watch the game.  I read the line, and it seems as if that was the case.  Anyway, he got another start on Friday, and he beat the slumping Yankees, so that's cool.  Good job, Jeremy.  I didn't watch that game either, or even watch any highlights yet, because it's just hard for me to watch Mariners baseball.

It was brought to my attention last weekend that there is a treasure trove of classic baseball games on a YouTube page called MLB Classics.  I've included a hyperlink there to the page.  Anyway, I decided to check it out this past Monday, since there were no day games and I had watched most of the previous day's Braves game so I needed some sort of baseball to watch.  There are many old, black and white games, mostly from World Series' and such.  But the one that caught my eye was the first ever game for the Florida Marlins against the Los Angeles Dodgers on April 5th, 1993.  Chris Berman was on the mic doing play-by-play for the game that aired on ESPN that opening day.  One thing I noticed is that a younger Chris Berman was a lot more...how do you say...uniform in his delivery as a play-by-play man.  I mean to say, he sounded more formulaic than what he is these days, which is Schticky, and gimmicky. That was nice.  Anyway, I couldn't help but notice and comment on Twitter about the Marlins horrible (in retrospect) decision to wear teal.  There was this fascination of new pro sports teams to use new, rarely seen color schemes when debuting in the 90's.  Not just in baseball, but in all sports.  Teal was exceptionally popular a color, with the Jacksonville Jaguars, San Jose Sharks and the Marlins all debuting in the 90's with that color.  The Jaguars have since shifted to a dark green, and the Marlins are primarily orange and black these days, but the Sharks are still riding high, wavin' the flag of team teal, and I got to respect that.  Also, purple was popular.  The Rockies and Diamondbacks wore purple.  Anyway, this isn't supposed to be a rant on color choices of teams, it's about the Marlins.  The thing that stood out about the teal color is their weird teal batting helmets.  They looked so weird, like an eraser head or something.  They made everyone's head seem bigger and more cumbersome.  I also liked that the first opening day pitcher for the Marlins was 45 year old veteran knuckleballer Charlie Hough.  Seeing a 45 year old man wear a teal hat throw a knuckleball at a young Mike Piazza or Eric Karros, truly something to behold.  Another thing, I know they've only been out of the football stadium for one full season now, but watching them play there that day, it had this temporary feel to it, like they would play in Joe Robbie stadium for a couple seasons and then get their own park like a lot of other expansion teams have done (Mets, Nationals for example) yet it took almost 20 years to get it done. I'm not going to make any sort of sweeping analysis of baseball in Florida (or any sports in Florida for that matter) but as long as I've been watching baseball, Marlins baseball has always felt the weirdest.  Their opening day game in 1993 was no different.  I only watched the first three of four innings, and then went off and did other things, but I'd seen enough to know that it felt awkward, and would feel awkward for the rest of my baseball watching life.  I guess that's a sweeping analysis, isn't it?  For some reason, even though they played in that mammoth stadium as recently as 2011, it was strange to see baseball being played in what is obviously a football stadium, even though teams like the A's do it 82 times a season.  I don't know, it felt off.

Okay, that's all.  Enjoy today's games.  Enjoy that YouTube page.  Have a good day, and let's all hope for a no-no this weekend, eh?  Or a cycle?  Both?  For the Padres?  By the same guy?  After all, it is the National League, the one league where a guy could conceivably pitch a no-hitter and also hit for the cycle in the same game.  Anything is possible in the National League!

Ballparks are the Best

I love ballparks.  It's one of the unique things about baseball I love.  Hockey used to have unique home ice advantages, but all that got taken away some time ago.  Like for example, the ice surface at the Boston Garden was actually shorter than "regulation" because of the smaller size of the old arena.  That's cool, but it's all gone now. In baseball, you can have weird demensions in ballparks for a home field advantage.  Sometimes I like it, sometimes I don't.

Like when Houston builds a stupid, gimick mound in centerfield, I don't like that.  You only did that to get attention.  But like, the ivy and the shape of the outfield wall of Wrigley.  That's cool.  It's uniquely Wrigley.  Green Monster, obviously is another.  I don't want to just say the weird walls are only allowed in ballparks 100 years old or older, but it's sort of just always been there that way, so that's cool to me.  If there is a usefull reason for a quirky jut in the outfield fence in a ballpark, I'm okay with it.  If it's there so that people will talk about the fact that it's there, that's not okay.

Like, if a team wants to make their park tough to hit in for righties, but a bandbox for lefties and then load up the roster with left-handed batters, that's a good strategy and that makes sense.  You can do that in baseball, and I love it.

Also, I was trying to think of teams that really need a new ballpark, and I could really only come up with one.  Oakland plays in a football stadium, and I can't wait for that era to officially be over.  When the Reds, Cardinals, Phillies, Pirates, Astros, Mariners, Padres, Twins, Nationals, Marlins and Giants all moved out of the gigantic, cookie cutter, multiuse, soulless stadiums in the 90's and 2000's, it was just all-around better for the game of baseball.  The only teams still playing in giganic stadiums like that are the Blue Jays and the A's.  For some reason, I don't really have a problem with the Jays still playing in SkyDome, AKA Rogers Centre, is that dispite it being 25 years old, it still has this cutting edge, newness to it.  It was the first time I'd ever heard of a retractable roof.  What a marvel of engineering.  Plus it's the Blue Jays, Canadians don't deserve our game up there.  (signed, bitter Nashville Predators fan)

But when you look around, there are some wonderful ballparks built around baseball, and that matters a lot to me when I'm choosing what teams to watch.  I don't mind watching the A's play in that football stadium, actually, despite everything I'm saying here, because I like the team. But normally, I don't like that atmosphere.  So like I said, I was thinking about what teams need a new park, and there really isn't anyone besides Oakland and perhaps the Rays.  Everything I hear about Tropicana Field is that it's a dump.  I imagine it is, maybe that's why no one goes to Rays games?  Must be.  But at least it doesn't feel like there's 672 people in the stands because the building is too large for baseball crowds, like it was in Miami for Marlins games.  And when the Marlins were bad (were, lol) and it was really empty, it was like watching the empty arena match between the Rock and Mankind during the halftime of Super Bowl XXXIII (I think). Just a weird atmosphere for those watching at home.

When a building is full and everyone is hanging on every play, it's so much more engaging for the person at home to watch.  That's why I like watching San Francisco Giants games.  That place is always packed, it's a cool, modern stadium with a throwback feel.  It's great.  Many teams have done the right thing in the past 10-15 years to upgrade their home ballpark experience, and I think it benefits all of baseball as a result.

I've only visited four MLB ballparks.  Wrigley, Miller Park, Turner Field and Fenway, in that order.  I've got 26 to go. Easiest for me to get to would be Cincinatti and St. Louis.   Let's get on the road, Caleb.  We've got baseball to watch.

-BJP

Advanced stats

There are a lot of advanced stats out there.  SABRmetrics, or whatever.  Listen, this all might just be coming from a place where I have a lack of understanding on the subject, but I don't really put a whole lot of stock in advanced stats.  That might sound weird, but I just think there are other ways of determining if a guy is a good baseball player or not.  Like, oh I don't know, watching a game.  I'm way more of an eyeball test kind of guy.  Does he look alright?  Then he's alright, isn't he? Guys get hot, guys get cold.  It comes and goes.  Everyone goes through this. I'll tell you right now, after writing this mini rant that I've been planning in my head, I'm going to go and search on Google "how to read and decipher advanced stats" and see if I can change my own mind on the subject.  But as of right now, I think fancy stats are only good for three things.  Number one is obviously fantasy baseball.  It's good to know if a guy is playing over his head or underachieving compared to what he usually does so you can win your fantasy league.  But this reason directly leads me to the number two and three reasons for using fancy stats for baseball is to sound smart, and to be right.  For me, I don't put much stock in being right all the time.  I've lost hundreds of arguments with my wife because I just don't care if I'm right.  She has to be right, it's in her nature.  It's part of what makes her special because she's determined to be right and smart and respected.  Me, I don't care.  I just want to get along with everyone and have a conversation about baseball.  Taht's why this blog exists.  I'm not going to (be able) to tell you that Tyler Lyons has a stranded runner rate of 91% because I looked it up.  I'll tell you that because the Sleeper and the Bust podcast told me that.  I had already dropped him anyway, but that helps the decision feel like the right one.  Is that a fancy stat?  Not really, that's a pretty regular stat, and I probably would have been able to tell you this stat if I had actually watched the Cardinals play for the past 15 days.

What I have watched is Atlanta Braves baseball, and I don't need fancy stats to tell you that Justin Upton had a terrible May, but his numbers don't look all that bad because he had an amazing April.  I know this because I've only missed a couple Braves games all year.  I know this team.  I don't know Cardinals very well.  I don't know Astros or Mariners or Yankees or Angels or really most of the league unless they've played the Braves.  I haven't watched any of their games more than an inning or two this year.  This is where I need people that read into fancy stats to tell me what they're doing.  Why do I run a baseball blog, anyway?

That brings me to my final point here.  What does advanced stats do for me as a fan?  Not as a fantasy baseball team owner, but as a fan of the Atlanta Braves and of baseball watching in general, how does knowing Dan Uggla's BABIP (if I knew what it was) change the way I feel every time he strikes out or flies out or grounds out or walks....which is all he does...Or hit a home run.  If Dan Uggla could just start hitting doubles I'd be impressed.  But he just doesn't.  And I don't need to look at any type of advanced stat to know he's not had a good year.  Knowing advanced stats does very, very little for me as a fan watching games.  What I care about is wins, strikeouts, hits, home runs, web gems, double plays, no-hitters, disputed calls, weird pitching wind-ups, weird pitching deliveries, 17 inning games, position players pitching, catchers throwing their masks off to make a catch on a popup behind the plate, "is a hit or is it an error?" yada yada yada.  Fancy stats are for people that don't watch baseball games.  That's my conclusion.  If that's the way you want to experience this game, then go for it.  Do whatever you want, but I'll just watch the game.  

Jeremy Bonderman to Start Today for Seattle

I can't sit here and tell you that I actually went out of my way to watch a whole lot of the 2003 Detroit Tigers.  You know, the one that went 43-119?  Were it not for an amazing rally in the final week of the season, this was the worst team in baseball history.  All that has been well documented, and after the signing of Pudge Rodriguez and the hiring of Jim Leyland, the Tigers turned the franchise into what I consider to be the class of the American League right now.  As a man who spent the first 26 years of my life in Michigan, I was very aware of the Detroit Tigers ups and downs, even if I didn't consider them "my team."  They were the game on TV, they were my dad's love, and they were my first baseball love.  While I don't live and die with Tigers baseball these days (or the days I'm about to talk about), I certainly have a long-term interest in the team and the team's performance.  I've watched my fair share of good, but mostly bad Detroit Tigers baseball. Most of my friends and family are Tigers fans.

 Just 10 short years ago, that's when this historic-for-the-wrong-reason season happened, I remember a couple things about that.  I've tried to block most of it out, mostly Bobby Higginson until about 25 minutes ago, but there are a few names I'll never forget.  The names Mike Maroth and Jeremy Bonderman.  A couple young pitchers thrown into the fire to burn because the team didn't have any other options.  While their owner was slinging $5 carryout pizzas and blowing all his cash on the Red Wings (don't think it's a coincidence that after the NHL lockout of 2004-2005, when the salary cap went way down, suddenly the Tigers had money to play with for free agents?) the Tigers grew increasingly and embarrassingly bad. 20 year old Jeremy Bonderman, in his first year with the big leagues, was run out there for 28 starts...and he lost 19 of them.  What were the Tigers supposed to do? They didn't have anyone else.  Bonderman had stuff, but he was just a raw kid.

I'll never forget that, what a man must learn getting pummeled for months on end.  It has to do something to you mentally and emotionally.  Well, things eventually turned around a bit for Jeremy, as he did get to start a game in the World Series just three seasons later (which he lost, but whatever, he started).  So I've always rooted for Mike Maroth, who lost 21 that year, and Bonderman.  Those guys took a beat down and didn't quit.  Bonderman would go on to an injury-riddled and shortened career, being diagnosed with Thoracic Outlet Syndrome, and then having Tommy John surgery.  I don't know if anyone really thought Jeremy Bonderman would ever pitch in the majors again.

But he's pitching today!  For Seattle!  Against the Twins!  There's nothing sports fans like more than winning championships, talking smack to fans of teams that are not your own, and a good comeback story.  This is the comeback story for the ages if he can pull this off.  Needless to say, I'll be watching for sure.  Jeremy Bonderman, I wish you the best of luck.  I want you to succeed so badly.  He used to throw that wicked slider for a strike that just broke off and made batters knees buckle.  I hope he still has that.  He's one of my favorite pitchers because of all the bullshit he's had to deal with and he didn't quit. I mean, look, I can't even write a post without using two huge paragraphs describing just half of what he went through.  The point here is to tell you that, if you are able, you should watch the Mariners game today.  Dude hasn't pitched in the majors since 2010.  I hope he does well.  I really, really do.

-BJP

Baseball Needs More Day Games

Baseball needs more day games.  I mean it.  More more more day games.  Of course, this is a pretty selfish request.  As a subscriber of MLB.tv, I have the privilege of watching whatever baseball game I want (except for the Braves and Reds whom are blacked out in my area) whenever I want.  When I want it is in the early afternoon.  As a stay at home dad, when the wife is away at work until 4:30 pm, I get to stay home and watch baseball...er the kids.  I watch the kids...and baseball.  I think there should be a baseball game on every day.  After all, baseball is supposed to be a lazy afternoon pastime anyway, right?  So I end up with a lot of Cubs games, which would be fine if they were a better team.  I mean, this week they certainly looked like quite the contender for the pennant, but let's be serious for a minute, they were playing the White Sox, after all.  It's not like they were beating up on any first place teams... Oh, except the first place Arizona Diamondbacks.  But let's not get carried away with that.  Watching the Cubs all the time is okay...but you know, I'd like a little variety.  A little bit of everyone every day would be really nice.

I usually look forward to Wednesdays, because that's when a lot of series' wrap up with day games so the teams can hit the road early for their next town/series.  I win there. A whole bunch of day games. Saturdays and Sunday's provide excellent day game action.  I can watch them.  I'm not in charge of any kids when those games happen but...I'm at work.  Don't tell my employer but I watch a lot of baseball while on the job.  Sorry, boss, I have an addiction to feed.  So that's good.  Day games on the weekend are good.

This little story comes about because I've become a baseball consuming monster.  I did this last May/June as well.  The big difference is that this season I've been watching baseball regularly since the day the season began.  Last year, it was only at about this time of the year that I started paying any attention to the season at all (thanks Stanley Cup Playoffs).  So I've gotten the same increase in baseball consumption as last year, but this time it's on top of my previous obsession.  This means I'm staring at clocks waiting for games to start.  This means that on days where there is no day games, I get sad and lost and lonely.  Thankfully, as I write this all down, there are games set to begin in about 15 minutes.  Indians - Rays, yo!  And they just finished up playing each other at like, two this morning because of rain delays.  Love it.  I just love it.  So lets watch some baseball, and preferably when the sun is high in the sky.  

One Tenth Done: My Reactions to MLB 2013 in April

We have played one tenth of the Major League Baseball season.  What we just watched, we'll just do that nine more times, and the season will be over before you even realized,

Some say that September wins are more important than April wins, and that may be true, a baseball team can really change complexions over the course of a season, but September wins will surely have a lot less pressure applied to them if you can get more wins in April.  Teams that get off to a hot start have a much easier path to the post season than teams that start slow and have to play catch-up all season.  Sometimes it works in the favor of the team with the slow start, but if you don't get up off the mat soon enough, you can be cooked by mid June.

One team that I recall getting off to a slow start and getting their act together was the 2005 Houston Astros.  If you remember, that team made it to the World Series against the White Sox that year.  A lot was made of their 15-30 start to the season, and I always since then check the standings at the 45 game mark, and see who is around that record at that time.  I look at that team and think, if the Astros could do it, anyone can.  So just because a team gets off to a slow start, doesn't mean their season is necessarily cooked.

The Tigers last year had a slow start, and were trying to catch the White Sox all year, and they did.  That was a good team that was underachieving early.  The 2005 Astros were a decent team, as well, a team that, if I remember correctly, had been in the playoffs the season prior.  They were expected to be good and started slow.  That's the difference between them and, lets say for example, the 2013 Houston Astros.  What a mess.  But it's not a surprise that the Astros are terrible, everyone knew they were going to be at the start of the season.  So the fact that they're bringing up the rear in the standings in the American League is no surprise at all.  Don't expect a miracle run out of these guys.

I tend to focus on the terrible teams in baseball because I feel bad for that teams fans.  I'm also very grateful that that team has never been my team.  I have this sick fascination with poor baseball teams, because it doesn't take much to be really bad.  Every team is pretty good.  Every baseball team since baseball has had a season that we record and recognize has won at least 40 games in a season.  And there is always fans in the stands.  It just amazes me that there were any fans in the stands at all for the 2003 Detroit Tigers season. Why would you waste your time?  It's just fascinating.

So 16 games (or so) into the 2013 season, we're starting to see who is good and who is not.  It's never for sure at this stage, but you can start to see it.  The Braves and Nationals are for real.  The Cubs and Marlins are really, really bad.  That's easy.  We all knew that going into this.  But it's the American League that I find really intriguing.  The AL east standings look like 2007.  The West looks like...well, not what I was exactly thinking, and the Central looks really mixed up.  I thought the Red Sox were going to be bad this year?  And I didn't think the Yankees had much of anything?  How are they the tops of the East?For the record, I wasn't drinking the Blue Jays kool-aid.  I just figured basically switch the Sox and the O's and you'd have what I expected.  But who gives a shit what I expect?  That's why they play the games.  It's early, and the difference between the last place Jays and first place Sox is only six games.  Same thing with the last place Indians and first place Royals, which is only 2.5 games.  There's still a lot of shaking out to do.  It's still too early to really say for sure who's who in the AL, but it surely feels like a different year over there.  Too bad I don't watch American League games.

More on that subject....very soon!

Go Baseball!

P.S. I've seen two instances of paper planes being flown onto the field in Toronto this season.  What's up with that?

Welcome Back

Hey

It's been a while, hasn't it?  How's it going out there?  Is anyone out there, even?

Listen, I've wanted to say something here about the off-season for the past few months, but really, it's hockey season and that's been my focus.  I love hockey, maybe even more than baseball.  But I cannot deny my undying love for baseball.  That is why I run a baseball blog and not a hockey blog, isn't it?

I don't even know where to begin.

Boy, the Braves sure look like their going to be good this year, don't they?  Just stacked, top to bottom.  The only hole I see is the 5th starting pitcher spot, and who knows, maybe Julio Tehran will be the next ace and we'll not have a hole at all?  But as of right now, it's a question mark, one of the very few that the Braves have.  Also, third base, for the first time in a very long time has a question mark.  I'm not that worried.  I thing Chris Johnson (not the running back) should be okay over there.  Every team needs an 8 hitter, right?

Enough about the Braves, I want to mention a life saver of a site that kept me in the loop all off-season.  It's the ESPN MLB Transaction page.  Without it, I would have missed every single one of those off-season transactions that don't get reported on the sites and radio broadcasts and news articles I read or listen to from time to time.  In the off-season  I just don't have time to keep up with everything, what with all the hockey I'm watching.  So a quick glance at the transactions page, I get the info I need and move along with my day, make my own opinions on the moves, and blog about it.  All true, except that last part, I suppose.

For example, I'm a massive Atlanta Braves fan, and you think I would stay connected to the team in December, but the fact of the matter is, I didn't.  I found out that Tommy Hansen was traded to the Angels via the Transactions page.  How did I not read about that on Twitter?  Because I don't follow much Braves stuff on there, because of spoilers.  I don't get to watch many Braves games live because I don't have cable, so I watch them the next morning.  I can't not check Twitter, so I don't follow baseball stuff on there.  The point I'm making is that Tommy Hansen got traded to Anaheim and I almost missed it.  Good for him, I suppose.  I believe he's done, but I hope he's not.  Dude was a strikeout machine when healthy.  I hope he finds success in the American League.  Good for him.

Anyway I've rambled along enough.  The season starts like, next week, so hopefully I'll be able to write about it regularly.  Baseball is just the best.